The ethical code of the profession protects this right when the act violates ethical, moral or religious principles or when the doctor feels that their professional judgment is being pressured; in such cases, they must provide a written reason to the clinical management of the health facility.
This point is made clear in an opinion published by the College of General and Family Medicine and included in the same report, since evaluating a person's fitness to drive involves assessing the risks to third parties in complicated social situations.
There is an inherent ethical and professional conflict involved in refusing or imposing conditions on the award of a certificate, as this could damage the long-standing relationship of trust and confidence between the patient and their doctor; for this reason, the Medical Association states that doctors should not be required to give out such certificates without exception.













I always thought that the reason for the visit to the doctor was to ensure that the driver wishing to renew his or her driving licence is in fact physically fit to drive. The doctor has a duty to refuse the medical certificate if that person does not meet the criteria. The doctor has to provide a written explanation of that decision and it can be contested. It is simply a matter of basic safety. Would anybody be surprised to learn that all aircraft pilots must have a regular medical review, the frequency depends on age, by an authorised doctor in order to renew a pilot's licence. Just a matter of safety.
By JC Audet from Beiras on 18 Sep 2026, 18:46
On the other hand, much younger drivers can be an extreme safety problem, especially younger male drivers. The tend to drive way over the speed limits, and take chances when it comes to passing or merging onto or off the highways. I witness it every time I get on the highway.
By Jeannette Kortz from Lisbon on 19 Sep 2026, 10:05